Why i think coco z sucks

explain how its great  , there is so much better exploits out there tbh i mean yeah its great but when you actually start using it as you're main exploit you will come across alot of problems.

We don't claim that coco z3 doesn't have memory leaks and the dll injector was removed because yoink owner forced us too.

Making Coco Z run more scripts and become more stable is pretty hard because well... You can only go so far with a wrapper, that's why we are making plans to switch to a Bytecode Conversion DLL.

We are planning to bring back the DLL Injector, when we were told to remove it at the time, Yoink Owner made the argument that the feature was exclusive to him, but now everyone and their mother has a DLL Injector so it's not special anymore.

You forgot to remember that Spectrum WAS Coco, at the time, we merged with another exploit called Demise, and that merger failed, so Coco was brought from the grave and a customer named MCGamin1738 wanted to merge his small indie exploit (Chromax) into Coco, so we did. That's how MCGamin1738 works at Coco now, and how Coco Hub looks exactly like Spectrum Hub, because it was, and it was part of Coco before the merger, so it belonged to us.

People use Coco Z for a reason, and that's because it just works for them in the way they needed to. We also used to be a small indie exploit that was always promoting ourselves on WeAreDevs, and we still talk actively to the community, so the familiarity of it would be another reason.

@Exploithunter

I myself wouldn't complain at how many scripts it can execute (supporting ofc).

While it may not support the scripts that some may want to use, it works, I'm pretty sure I tested it a while back and it was quite good, it executed the scripts I use which tbh aren't too "high end".

It's a free Exploit, you can't expect it to execute anything, think about Owl Hub, no free exploit supported it until KRNL (I think that was the first) supported it.

@stephen_ hello , there is exploits like electron witch didnt even break owl hub support when the roblox update.

again coco z isnt that good i remember it not even running jailbricked the time it was free

as for it being  a wrapper , I would think sona would be better but coco does a good job as a wrapper even running owl hub is pretty impersive as a wrapper.

@Exploithunter jailbricked is extremely hard to run on most executors

i remember it running on oxygen electron etc

again yes you are right it is good for a wrapper.

but i woudnt use this as my main exploit for sure cause there is much better exploits , Some even with remote spy.

as for pardella RENEWED Btw you are doing a very good job keep up the good work on that exploit , maybe add some more dlls too! 

What you are saying i can agree on but keep in mind this is a free exploit that has more power than your regular furkOS or KiwiX (which should not exist)

Scripts: this is something that gets work on overtime, u cant simply make an API run Dex with a decompiler in 5 minutes, coco is still new (i would say) but I do get what you are saying when people describe coco and how good it is.

Stable: this I can agree on, coco doesn't crash often but crashes can be annoying as it does tend to crash a few times, again this will be fixed over time with development and knowledge amongst the coco team. 

DLL Injector: Yes I agree this would be perfect if they can bring it back!

Reason cocoz is popular is due to obviously the exploit and its team, they are very active, always im proving and trying to be the best out of everyone and that's what every exploit should do this brings the spotlight to them, I love there marketing scheme of being active and there account attracting users to the website and to there exploit.

Hello thanks for you're replay , note that i didnt ment coco z is unstable in injection , when you run kill all for arsenal for example it will fps drop will killing all unlike some other exploits , as for injection coco z is a fine injection its slow but rarely crashes

@Exploithunter

May I know which script drops your FPS? I've used a kill-all on arsenal before and it has dropped my FPS so it may not just be an issue on Coco.

Edit: if it's a newer kill-all I won't know if it's the script or not so yeah

Another Edit:
You mentioned Jailbricked, even I had a few issues running that script and I was using Synapse X at the time 

hello , there is a diffrence beetween using it on oygen , electron etc then using it on coco the kill all script is pretty old , shoot to kill all on coco z pretty sure also did not run

Coco is pretty stable on my virtual machine, and it may have an HVM very soon thanks to Virtualisation.

i mentionned things related to virtualisation 3 times haha funny

Also, i suggest not insulting Coco users when you literally can't spell.

Coco Z has a nice UI, it has okay execution, and an excellent community.

For the key system, i see that some users are getting issues with the key system, and it is very hard to debug it for Wabz as my key system looks to be working properly for Wabz and the client side looks to be working properly for MCGamin. However, i will try to make it as good as i can, and if you have ideas on what is happening, or questions to ask about it, feel free to DM my friend Wabz (Wabz#0001) or make a ticket on the Coco Z server.

@TotallyNotWabz   community is a little sh!t they always call other people skids in games when they are the one using free exploits.

as for execution i would rather just use another exploit without a key system.

but i understand that the dll is custom made and its  a wrapper so yeah , the only thing i can say is fix save instance it lags you're game as hell